NAIHC News Archives

Entries from July 2001

Canada Reconsiders Industrial Hemp Regulations

July 28, 2001 · Leave a Comment

Canada Gazette, Part I Volume 135, Number 30

OTTAWA, SATURDAY, JULY 28, 2001

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

CONTROLLED DRUGS AND SUBSTANCES ACT

Notice to Interested Parties - Proposal to Review the Existing Regulatory Framework for the Commercial Cultivation of Industrial Hemp

The Drug Strategy and Controlled Substances Programme of Health Canada intends to evaluate the Industrial Hemp Regulations with a view to amending the Regulations and modifying the program, if necessary. All interested stakeholders are invited to submit written comments on the existing regulatory framework. An additional opportunity for comments will be provided when proposed amendments to the Regulations are published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, in the year 2002.

The Industrial Hemp Regulations, pursuant to the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, were drafted after consultation with a wide range of stakeholders. They came into effect on March 18, 1998. Copies of the Regulations, application forms and guideline documents are available for download from the industrial hemp Web site at:

http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hpb-dgps/therapeut/htmleng/hemp.html.

Printed copies of the applications and guidelines are available by request. The Industrial Hemp Regulations can be purchased for a minimal fee from the Canada Communications Group, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0S9, or by telephone at (613) 956-4802, or toll free at 1-800-635-7943.

Comments may be sent to: Niels Hansen-Trip, Co-ordinator, Industrial Hemp Program Post Implementation Review, Office of Controlled Substances, Drug Strategy and Controlled Substances Programme, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Address Locator 3502A, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 1B9, or by electronic mail at: Hemp_BdsTpd@hc-sc.gc.ca. Comments must be received by September 14, 2001, in order to be considered during this review.

July 10, 2001

JODY GOMBER, PH.D.
Director General

Drug Strategy and Controlled Substances Programme

Healthy Environments and
Consumer Safety Branch

To access the original as published in the Canada Gazette, go to: http://canada.gc.ca/gazette/part1/ascII/g1-13530_e.txt .

Categories: News

American Indian Tribe Challenges U.S. Government

July 26, 2001 · Leave a Comment

American Indian Tribe Challenges U.S. Government on Growing Industrial Hemp

PRESS RELEASE July 26, 2001

Oglala Lakota Nation Asserts Treaty Rights to S.D. US Attorney in Industrial Hemp Dispute

Pine Ridge, SD — A July 18, 2001 letter from John Yellow Bird Steele, President of the Oglala Lakota Nation (Pine Ridge), to Michelle Tapken, US Attorney for South Dakota, asserts the Indian nation’s right to grow industrial hemp under provisions of the Fort Laramie Treaty of 1868. (Click Here for copy of the letter.) This assertion is a direct challenge to the US government’s implication that the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) of 1970 abrogates provisions of the 1868 treaty.

The DEA cut down the first industrial hemp crop at Pine Ridge in a widely publicized raid on August 24th, 2000, conducted under the auspices of the CSA. The treaty of 1868 gave the Lakota Indian nations the mandate to grow food and fiber crops, effectively switching their livelihood to an agricultural base, which is generally recognized as part of the treaty’s original intent. Hemp was commonly grown in the United States at the time of the Fort Laramie Treaty.

The Controlled Substances Act of 1970 is a federal statute that criminalized the production, manufacture, and distribution of controlled substances, including marijuana. The CSA defined marijuana without distinction from industrial hemp. Legislation in various states in recent years (including Nebraska, Kentucky, Dakotas’, and Hawaii among others has sought to distinguish between industrial hemp and marijuana by defining hemp in terms of its low tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) content. THC is the psychoactive chemical in marijuana.

On July 28th, 1998, the Lakota Nation passed an ordinance that defined industrial hemp as Cannabis sativa plants containing less than 1 percent THC by weight, the same definition used in legislation seeking to legalize industrial hemp in various states. The ordinance did not affect the existing illegal status of marijuana in the Oglala Lakota Nation.

Laws like the CSA are not applicable to Indians unless the act expressly states that it applies to Indians and that it is abrogating any treaty right the Indians may have. However, before ever getting to the treaty, the Lakota have a reserved right to grow industrial hemp by virtue of their sovereignty preexisting that of the U. S. Government. Therefore, the Lakota argue that the CSA is inapplicable to its citizens and does not preempt an Indian’s right to engage in agriculture, including the growing of industrial hemp, under the Fort Laramie Treaty.

The Oglala Lakota Nation, in the July 18th letter to the US Attorney’s office, argue that the “Controlled Substances Act of 1970 did not divest the Lakota People of our reserved right to plant and harvest whatever crop we deem beneficial to our reservation. Therefore, we regard the enforcement of our hemp ordinance and prosecution of our marijuana laws as tribal matters to be handled by our Oglala Sioux Tribal Public Safety Law Enforcement Services.”

The harvest season for industrial hemp takes place during August. The US Attorney for South Dakota has recently asserted that any individual continuing to grow hemp on the Pine Ridge Reservation will be prosecuted with penalties of minimum ten years to life in prison. The hemp is used to build houses, which would replace current substandard housing on the reservation. The situation is causing great concern among the Native Americans.

For more information, see http://www.nativesunite.org/hemp.

For a background article on the dispute and the Fort Laramie Treaty of 1868, see http://www.nativesunite.org/hemp/treaty.CSA/index.html

 

Categories: News